Holt et al v. Fidelity National Insurance Company et al
| Charles Holt and Penny Harris-Holt |
| Fidelity National Insurance Company and Geico Insurance Agency |
| 3:2014cv00031 |
| January 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Walter H Rice |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed on 03/31/15. (pb1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
22
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Geico Insurance Agency and Fidelity National Insurance Company be Granted and the case be terminated on the docket of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 3/30/2015. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 3-11-15. (mcm1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER - In light of Plaintiffs refusal or inability to confer with Defendants as required, and having provided them more than ample time to do so, Defendants are hereby ORDERED to file a Rule 26(f) Report on or before May 16, 2014 without the need to first consult with Plaintiffs regarding the proposed dates. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 5/14/2014. (rms)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
