Miami Valley Fair Housing Center, Inc. v. Brand et al
| Miami Valley Fair Housing Center, Inc. |
| Marcia Brand, Carl Woolley and Laura [LNU] |
| 3:2014cv00219 |
| July 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Housing/Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 56((D), DOC. 16 , AND DENYING MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER PARTIALLY STAYING DISCOVERY PENDING A DECISION ON THE DISPOSITIVE MOTION. DOC. 15 . Becau se discovery is necessary for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff's Motion for Additional Discovery Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d), doc. 16, is GRANTED. Plaintiff is granted until 20 days after the close of discovery torespond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Because the case is most efficiently resolved by engaging in one round of discovery and because the Court has already established a discovery plan by adopting the Parties' jointly proposed discovery plan, Defendants' Motion for a Protective Order Partially Staying Discovery Pending a Decision on the Dispositive Motion, doc.15, is DENIED. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 5/4/15. (ep)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
