Clay v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Petitioner: James H. Clay
Respondent: Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Case Number: 3:2014cv00319
Filed: September 26, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: MIAMI
Presiding Judge: Michael R Merz
Presiding Judge: Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 16 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. # 10 ) AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. # 14 ) ; OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS THERETO (DOCS. ## 12 , 15 ); DISMISSING PETI TION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOC. # 1 ) WITH PREJUDICE; JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF RESPONDENT AND AGAINST PETITIONER; DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 5/5/2015. (ead)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
April 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Clay has not shown his entitlement to habeas corpus relief and his Petition should be dismissed. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate o f appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in formapauperis. Objections to R&R due by 5/4/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 4/16/2015. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
February 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Petition herein be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the C ourt should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted toproceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 3/2/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 2/11/2015. (kpf1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clay v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James H. Clay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Represented By: M Scott Criss
Represented By: Hilda Rosenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?