Busby v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
Pattie Busby |
Bank of America, N.A., Reimer, Arnovitz, Chernek & Jeffrey Co., LPA, Mohit Pathan and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. |
3:2014cv00410 |
December 1, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Dayton Office |
MONTGOMERY |
Michael R Merz |
Thomas M Rose |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 64 ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF PATTIE BUSBY'S OBJECTIONS 61 AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 60 IN THEIR ENTIRETY. Case remains terminated. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 10-14-2015. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 60 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT - It is respectully recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for Rule 60(b) Relief (ECF No. 59) be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 9/14/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 8/28/2015. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 55 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Plaintiff's Objections are without merit and it is again respectfully recommended that her Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) Motion be stricken as untimely filed. Objections to R&R due by 8/7/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 7/21/2015. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 52 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for Rule 59 Relief (Doc. No. 51) be stricken as untimely. Objections to R&R due by 7/23/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 7/3/2015. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 48 ORDER OVERRULING BUSBY'S OBJECTIONS (DOC. 33 ) TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; OVERRULING BUSBY'S OBJECTIONS (DOC. 40 ) TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; DENYING BUSBY'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMP LAINT (DOC. 32 ); ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 31 ) AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 36 ) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; AND TERMINATING THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 6/3/15. (ep)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 47 DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL 46 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 5/28/2015. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 36 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS; DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO AMEND - Having reconsidered the Report in light of the Objections, it is again respectfully recommended that the Complaint herein be dismissed with prejudi ce. Objections to R&R due by 5/11/2015. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 32) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 4/22/2015. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 31 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Complaint herein be dismissed with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 4/20/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 4/3/2015. (kpf1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.