Edwards v. Dayton Police Department et al
Drake A Edwards |
Mark Gross, Foster Jones, Jim Miller, Montgomery County Sheriff Department, Dayton Police Department and Ronald Robinson |
3:2014cv00457 |
December 17, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Dayton Office |
MONTGOMERY |
Michael R Merz |
Walter H Rice |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATEJUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. # 3 );DISMISSING COMPLAINT (DOC. # 2 ) WITHOUT PREJUDICE;JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINSTPLAINTIFF; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 01/12/2015. (ead1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Complaint in this case should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Clerk shall not issue process in this case until further order of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 1/9/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 12/23/2014. (kpf1)(This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.