Fortkamp v. Timothy Roberson, ABN AMRO MTG. GROUP d.b.a. CT Corporation System et al
| Yvonne Fortkamp |
| ABN AMRO MTG GROUP and CitiMortgage, Inc. |
| 3:2014cv00458 |
| December 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Michael R Merz |
| Walter H Rice |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of ABN AMRO MTG GROUP, CitiMortgage, Inc. against Yvonne Fortkamp. Signed on 3/31/2015. (ead1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 19 Report and Recommendations,,. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 3/24/2015. (ead1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
22
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that this case be dismissed with prejudice as barred by res judicata. Because res judicata doctrine fully disposes of this case, there is no need to analyze the balance of Defendants' arguments. Objections to R&R due by 3/30/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 3/11/2015. (kpf1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
19
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is untimely and should be denied without prejudice to its renewal after the pleadings are closed. Plaintiff is also notified that her Motion does not constitute a suff icient response to the Motion To Dismiss. He response was due to be filed not later than March 2, 2015, and is now untimely. Objections to R&R due by 3/20/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 3/3/2015. (kpf1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
