Marshall v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Marshall v. Commissioner of Social Security

Marshall v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Jerry Marshall
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	3:2014cv00465
Filed:	December 23, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Dayton Office
County:	GREENE
Presiding Judge:	Michael J Newman
Presiding Judge:	Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 11, 2015	Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 12 Report and Recommendations. it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #12) is ADOPTED in full; 2. The Commissioner's non-disability determination is REVERSED; 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under the FourthSentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings; and 4. This case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 12/10/2015. (srb)
November 17, 2015	Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT: (1) THE ALJS NON-DISABILITY FINDING BE FOUND UNSUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, AND REVERSED; (2) THIS MATTER BE REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER UNDER THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) FOR PROCEEDINGS CONSI STENT WITH THIS OPINION; AND (3) THIS CASE BE CLOSED - re 3 Complaint filed by Jerry Marshall Objections to R&R due by 12/7/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 11/17/2015. (srb) Modified on 11/18/2015 to correct objections due date. NEF regenerated (jg).

Date Filed

Document Text

December 11, 2015

Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 12 Report and Recommendations. it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #12) is ADOPTED in full; 2. The Commissioner's non-disability determination is REVERSED; 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under the FourthSentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings; and 4. This case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 12/10/2015. (srb)

November 17, 2015

Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT: (1) THE ALJS NON-DISABILITY FINDING BE FOUND UNSUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, AND REVERSED; (2) THIS MATTER BE REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER UNDER THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) FOR PROCEEDINGS CONSI STENT WITH THIS OPINION; AND (3) THIS CASE BE CLOSED - re 3 Complaint filed by Jerry Marshall Objections to R&R due by 12/7/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 11/17/2015. (srb) Modified on 11/18/2015 to correct objections due date. NEF regenerated (jg).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marshall v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jerry Marshall
Represented By:	Steven Barry Horenstein
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	John J. Stark
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?