Laurent v. Diltz et al
| Jayme Laurent |
| Troy Diltz, Scott Short, Matthew Blair, Brian Carr, City Of Huber Heights, Ohio, John Doe, 1, Montgomery County, Ohio and the Montgomery County Board of Commissioners, Phil Plummer and John Doe 2-5 |
| 3:2017cv00343 |
| October 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Walter H. Rice |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING JOINT MOTION TO MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE (DOC. # 47 ); CONFERENCE CALL SET FOR APRIL 25, 2019, TO SET NEW TRIAL DATE; SUSTAINING NUNC PRO TUNC PREVIOUSLY-FILED JOINT MOTION TO MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE (DOC. # 46 ). (Scheduling Conference set for 4/25/2019 04:30 PM by Teleconference before Judge Walter H. Rice). Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 4/15/2019. (srb)
|
|
Filing
41
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. # 40 ); OVERRULING THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT NAPHCARE, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT (DOC. # 17 ). Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 11/16/18. (kma)
|
|
Filing
40
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Third-Party Defendant NaphCare, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 17 ) be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 11/15/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 11/1/2018. (lk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
