Roberts v. Target Corporation
Plaintiff: Linda Roberts
Defendant: Target Corporation
Case Number: 5:2011cv00951
Filed: August 23, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Vicki Miles-LaGrange
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 182 ORDER denying 100 plaintiff's motion to conditionally certify class, order defendant to produce contact information for the prospective class members, and for authorization to issue class notice...see order further specifics. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 09/17/2013. (lam)
October 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER denying 90 plaintiff's motion to compel except to the limited extent noted in the order...see order for specifics. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 10/01/2012. (lam)
June 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER granting 53 and 55 ...plaintiff's Rule 23 class claims and the claim for injunctive relief are dismissed with prejudice...all allegations with respect to Robert Lovio, Joe Marotta and Janice Watson are stricken...as the amended complain t contains not allegations regarding constructive discharge once those allegations are stricken, defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings with respect to any constructive discharge claim is also granted. See order for further specifics. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 06/20/2012. (lam)
February 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER...defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's Rule 23 Class Action and Constructive Discharge Claims 13 is GRANTED; plaintiff is granted leave to amend her complaint within 10 days of the date of this order; plaintiff's unopposed motion for leave to file amended complaint 21 and plaintiff's amended motion for leave to file an amended complaint 22 are DENIED as MOOT; plaintiff's motion to join party plaintiffs 31 and plaintiff's second motion to join party plaintiffs 44 are DENIED. See order for further specifics. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 02/07/2012. (lam)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roberts v. Target Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Linda Roberts
Represented By: Jana Beth Leonard
Represented By: Shannon C Haupt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Represented By: Susanna M Gattoni
Represented By: Elisabeth E Muckala
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?