Knox v. Miller

Petitioner: Antonio L Knox
Respondent: Chad Miller
Case Number: 5:2013cv00390
Filed: April 19, 2013
Court: Oklahoma Western District Court
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Payne
Referring Judge: Gary M. Purcell
Presiding Judge: Lee R. West
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 23, 2013 18 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; the Court ADOPTS the 16 Report and Recommendation; GRANTS Jones' 11 Motion to Dismiss Writ of Habeas Corpus; in so doing DECLINES Knox's request that the Court grant him an extension of time to exhaust available remedies; DISMISSES Knox's Petition w/o prej. Signed by Honorable Lee R. West on 7/23/13. (ap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Knox v. Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Antonio L Knox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Chad Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.