Quantum Technology Partners II, L.P. v. Altman Browning and Company, et al
Quantum Technology Partners II, L.P. |
Altman Browning and Company, Baker Group LLP, Kay E Altman, Michael J Baker, David M Browning, Does 1 Through 20 and Apex Drive Laboratories Inc |
3:2008cv00376 |
March 25, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland Office |
Outside State |
Anna J. Brown |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 75 AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER. For these reasons, the Court GRANTS the Motion (#37) to Dismiss filed by Nominal Defendant Apex Drive Laboratories, Inc.; GRANTS the Motion (#39) to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment filed by Defenda nts Baker Group LLP and Michael J. Baker; GRANTS the Motion (#44) to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment filed by defendants Altman Browning and Company, Kay E. Altman, and David M. Browning; and DENIES the Motion (#58) for Leave to Fi le (Third) Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Quantum Technology Partners II, L.P. The Court DENIES in part and GRANTS in part Quantum's Motion to File (Third) Amended Complaint to the extent that Quantum has leave to file no later than July 7 , 2009, a Third Amended Complaint limited to a putative claim for breach of contract asset out by Quantum in its Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint. The Court also GRANTS Defendants leave to file any Motions to Dismiss as to Quantum's Third Amended Complaint by July 28, 2009.. Signed on 6/24/09 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (ljl) |
Filing 74 OPINION AND ORDER: For these reasons, the Court GRANTS the Motion (#37) to Dismiss filed by Nominal Defendant Apex Drive Laboratories, Inc.;GRANTS the Motion (#39) to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Baker Group LLP and Michael J. Baker; GRANTS the Motion (#44) to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Altman Browning and Company, Kay E. Altman, and David M. Browning; and DENIES the Motion (#58) for Leave to File (Third ) Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Quantum Technology Partners II, L.P. The Court DENIES in part and GRANTS in part Quantum's Motion to File (Third) Amended Complaint to the extent that Quantum has leave to file no later than July 7, 2009, a Third Amended Complaint limited to a putative claim for breach of contract asset out by Quantum in its Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint. The Court also GRANTS Defendants leave to file any Motions to Dismiss as to Quantum's Third Amended Complaint by July 28, 2009. 37 ; 39 ; 44 ; 58 . Amended Complaint is due 7/7/2009. Signed on 6/23/09 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (ljl) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.