Quantum Technology Partners II, L.P. v. Altman Browning and Company, et al
Plaintiff: Quantum Technology Partners II, L.P.
Defendant: Altman Browning and Company, Baker Group LLP, Kay E Altman, Michael J Baker, David M Browning, Does 1 Through 20 and Apex Drive Laboratories Inc
Case Number: 3:2008cv00376
Filed: March 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland Office
County: Outside State
Presiding Judge: Anna J. Brown
Nature of Suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 75 AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER. For these reasons, the Court GRANTS the Motion (#37) to Dismiss filed by Nominal Defendant Apex Drive Laboratories, Inc.; GRANTS the Motion (#39) to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment filed by Defenda nts Baker Group LLP and Michael J. Baker; GRANTS the Motion (#44) to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment filed by defendants Altman Browning and Company, Kay E. Altman, and David M. Browning; and DENIES the Motion (#58) for Leave to Fi le (Third) Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Quantum Technology Partners II, L.P. The Court DENIES in part and GRANTS in part Quantum's Motion to File (Third) Amended Complaint to the extent that Quantum has leave to file no later than July 7 , 2009, a Third Amended Complaint limited to a putative claim for breach of contract asset out by Quantum in its Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint. The Court also GRANTS Defendants leave to file any Motions to Dismiss as to Quantum's Third Amended Complaint by July 28, 2009.. Signed on 6/24/09 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (ljl)
June 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 74 OPINION AND ORDER: For these reasons, the Court GRANTS the Motion (#37) to Dismiss filed by Nominal Defendant Apex Drive Laboratories, Inc.;GRANTS the Motion (#39) to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Baker Group LLP and Michael J. Baker; GRANTS the Motion (#44) to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Altman Browning and Company, Kay E. Altman, and David M. Browning; and DENIES the Motion (#58) for Leave to File (Third ) Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Quantum Technology Partners II, L.P. The Court DENIES in part and GRANTS in part Quantum's Motion to File (Third) Amended Complaint to the extent that Quantum has leave to file no later than July 7, 2009, a Third Amended Complaint limited to a putative claim for breach of contract asset out by Quantum in its Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint. The Court also GRANTS Defendants leave to file any Motions to Dismiss as to Quantum's Third Amended Complaint by July 28, 2009. 37 ; 39 ; 44 ; 58 . Amended Complaint is due 7/7/2009. Signed on 6/23/09 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (ljl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Quantum Technology Partners II, L.P. v. Altman Browning and Company, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quantum Technology Partners II, L.P.
Represented By: John S. Stewart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Altman Browning and Company
Represented By: Devon Zastrow Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Baker Group LLP
Represented By: Gary I. Grenley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kay E Altman
Represented By: Devon Zastrow Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Baker
Represented By: Gary I. Grenley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David M Browning
Represented By: Devon Zastrow Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 Through 20
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apex Drive Laboratories Inc
Represented By: Daniel P. Larsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?