Cases 1 - 10 of 21
El-Bey v. Schiffer et al
as 1:2024cv01036
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Jenniffer B Schiffer, John Addison Howard, Roberl Brisco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bro Michael El-Bey v. Shannon Avery
as 23-1737
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRO STEPHEN MICHAEL EL-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SHANNON E. AVERY, Covet Administrator, RAYNARDO GOMEZ, DAVID M. BROWN and others
El-Bey v. Avery, et al.
as 1:2022cv02105
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Shannon E. Avery, Raynardo Gomez, David M. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brown v. Harry et al
as 1:2022cv00465
Petitioner:
David M. Brown
Respondent:
Laurel Harry and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Harry et al
as 1:2022cv00115
Petitioner:
David M. Brown
Respondent:
Laurel Harry and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv03024
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. BROWN and ELLEN S. BROWN
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. San Diego Housing Commission
as 3:2014cv02007
Plaintiff:
David M. Brown
Defendant:
San Diego Housing Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Rosenbaum
as 3:2014cv01880
Plaintiff:
David M. Brown
Defendant:
Daniel Rosenbaum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Michael Galles et al v. Hortense Granderson et al
as 5:2014cv01281
Defendant:
David M Brown, County of Riverside Department of Public Social Services, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Galles and Christina McManus
A.M. et al v County of Riverside
as 5:2014cv00830
Defendant:
Dean Benjamin, David M Brown, City of Hemet and others
Plaintiff:
A. M., A. M., M. M. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
