BUNDAY v. WALSH et al
| NATHANIEL BUNDAY |
| JEROME WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2013cv03437 |
| June 18, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| LEGROME D. DAVIS |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER THAT BY 5/23/22, THE COMMONWEALTH SHALL FILE A BRIEF ADDRESSING WHETHER PETITIONER NATANIEL BUNDY HAS AN OPPORTUNITY TO EXHAUST HIS HABEAS CLAIMS IN STATE COURT. BY 6/6/22, MR. BUNDAY MAY FILE A RESPONSIVE BRIEF; ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET ON 5/9/22. 5/9/22 ENTERED AND NOT MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(JL)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS STAYED AND HELD IN ABEYANCE UNTIL THE CONCLUSION OF THE STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS. PETITIONER SHALL RETURN TO FEDERAL COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FOLLOWING THE CONCLUSION OF HIS STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS. IF PETITIONER DOES NOT RETURN TO FEDERAL COURT WITHIN THAT TIME, THIS STAY AND ABEYANCE ORDER WILL BE VACATED AND HIS PETITION WILL BE DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THERE IS NO CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LEGROME D. DAVIS ON 10/2/13. 10/2/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER. (jpd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
