HAMM v. SANCHEZ et al
ANCELL EUGENE HAMM |
CHESTER COUNTY JURY FOREMAN CHARLES LAST NAME UNKNOWN, JUAN R. SANCHEZ, CHARLES ZAGORSKI, THOMAS L. WHITEMAN and WILLIAM BILLY LAMB |
2:2021cv02800 |
June 11, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
MITCHELL S GOLDBERG |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing Fee for COMPLAINT by ANCELL EUGENE HAMM. (Filing Fee $402, PPE229591 (Filing fee $ 402.) (jaa, ) |
Filing 3 Letter dated 6/28/21 Check/money order is made out for the incorrect amount. (sbt, ) |
Filing 2 ORDER THAT IF HAMM SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION HE MUST, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER PAY $402 TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT AS OUTLINED HEREIN. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH HAMM WITH A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURT'S CURRENT STANDARD PRISONER IN FORMA PAUPERIS FORM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 6/25/21. 6/25/21 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE WITH IFP FORM. (amas, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CHESTER COUNTY JURY FOREMAN CHARLES LAST NAME UNKNOWN, WILLIAM BILLY LAMB, JUAN R. SANCHEZ, THOMAS L. WHITEMAN, CHARLES ZAGORSKI, filed by ANCELL EUGENE HAMM. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED)(bw, ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by ANCELL EUGENE HAMM. (bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.