HAMM v. SANCHEZ et al
Plaintiff: ANCELL EUGENE HAMM
Defendant: CHESTER COUNTY JURY FOREMAN CHARLES LAST NAME UNKNOWN, JUAN R. SANCHEZ, CHARLES ZAGORSKI, THOMAS L. WHITEMAN and WILLIAM BILLY LAMB
Case Number: 2:2021cv02800
Filed: June 11, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: MITCHELL S GOLDBERG
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing Fee for COMPLAINT by ANCELL EUGENE HAMM. (Filing Fee $402, PPE229591 (Filing fee $ 402.) (jaa, )
June 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Letter dated 6/28/21 Check/money order is made out for the incorrect amount. (sbt, )
June 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER THAT IF HAMM SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION HE MUST, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER PAY $402 TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT AS OUTLINED HEREIN. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH HAMM WITH A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURT'S CURRENT STANDARD PRISONER IN FORMA PAUPERIS FORM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 6/25/21. 6/25/21 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE WITH IFP FORM. (amas, )
June 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CHESTER COUNTY JURY FOREMAN CHARLES LAST NAME UNKNOWN, WILLIAM BILLY LAMB, JUAN R. SANCHEZ, THOMAS L. WHITEMAN, CHARLES ZAGORSKI, filed by ANCELL EUGENE HAMM. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED)(bw, )
June 11, 2021 Opinion or Order DEMAND for Trial by Jury by ANCELL EUGENE HAMM. (bw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HAMM v. SANCHEZ et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHESTER COUNTY JURY FOREMAN CHARLES LAST NAME UNKNOWN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JUAN R. SANCHEZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHARLES ZAGORSKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THOMAS L. WHITEMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WILLIAM BILLY LAMB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANCELL EUGENE HAMM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?