Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
HAMM v. ZAGORSKI et al
as 2:2021cv04806
Plaintiff: ANCELL E. HAMM and ANCELL EUGENE HAMM
Defendant: CHARLES ZAGORSKI, WILLIAM BILLY LAMB, THOMAS L. WHITEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMM v. SANCHEZ et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv02800
Defendant: CHESTER COUNTY JURY FOREMAN CHARLES LAST NAME UNKNOWN, JUAN R. SANCHEZ, CHARLES ZAGORSKI and others
Plaintiff: ANCELL EUGENE HAMM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMM v. ZAGORSKIE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv04659
Defendant: TOM HOGAN, RONALD C. NAGLE, CHARLES (LAST NAME UNKNOWN) and others
Plaintiff: ANCELL EUGENE HAMM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMM v. CAPOZZE et al
as 2:2020cv03135
Respondent: MARK CAPOZZE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER
Petitioner: ANCELL EUGENE HAMM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ancell Hamm v. Jeffrey Schmehl, et al
as 19-1384
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI, JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL and J. WILLIAM DITTER, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANCELL EUGENE HAMM
HAMM v. SCHMEHL et al
as 2:2018cv03093
Respondent: JUDGE DITTER, MARK CAPOZZA and JUDGE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL
Petitioner: ANCELL EUGENE HAMM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ancell Hamm v. Superintendent Fayette SCI
as 17-1839
Petitioner: ANCELL EUGENE HAMM
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI
HAMM V. LANE, ET AL.
as 2:2017cv00687
Petitioner: ANCELL EUGENE HAMM
Respondent: JAY LANE, GAOLER and SCI-FAYETTE STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ancell Hamm v. President United States of Ame, et al
as 16-1605
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANCELL EUGENE HAMM
Defendant - Appellee: PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and SECRETARY GENERAL UNITED NATIONS
HAMM v. OBAMA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01517
Petitioner: ANCELL EUGENE HAMM
Respondent: BARAK OBAMA and BAN KI-MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?