L. et al v. BOYERTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
| B. L. and D. N. |
| BOYERTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, CHRISTOPHER IACOBELLI and BRIAN M. SHPOCK |
| 5:2008cv05194 |
| October 31, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Berks |
| JOEL H. SLOMSKY |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 29:0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANTS BOYERTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT AND CHRISTOPHER IACOBELLI'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 20 , DEFENDANT SHPOCK'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMP LAINT 19 AND PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS BASD AND IACOBELLI'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT 17 , IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NOS. 19 , 20 ) ARE GRANTED AND PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THE CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 7/1/09. 7/2/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
|
|
Filing
6
OPINION AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION 4 IS GRANTED AND PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF SHALL BE GRANTED THIRTY (30) DAYS IN WHICH TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 2/24/09. 2/25/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
