Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv05204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joel Doe, et al v. Boyertown Area School District, et al
as 17-3113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL DOE, A Minor, by and through his Guardians John Doe and Jane Doe, MACY ROE, MARY SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BOYERTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, DR. BRETT COOPER, DR. E. WAYNE FOLEY, In his officidal capacity as Assistant Principal and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2946
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DOE v. BOYERTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 5:2017cv01249
Plaintiff:
JOEL DOE , MACY ROE , MARY SMITH and others
Defendant:
BOYERTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, DR. RICHARD FAIDLEY, DR. BRETT COOPER and others
Movant:
AIDAN DESTEFANO and PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH CONGRESS FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FORTES v. BOYERTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2012cv06063
Plaintiff:
BRENDA JOYCE FORTES
Defendant:
BOYERTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KREIS et al v. BOYERTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 5:2011cv04547
Plaintiff:
DAVID KREIS and TANIA KREIS
Defendant:
BOYERTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
J.E. et al v. BOYERTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 5:2010cv02958
Plaintiff:
J.E. and A.E.
Defendant:
BOYERTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
