GEIST v. AMMARY et al
VICTORIA GEIST |
JASON AMMARY and CITY OF ALLENTOWN |
5:2011cv07532 |
December 7, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Allentown Office |
Lehigh |
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 88 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANTS MAY SERVE A SUBPOENA AD TESTIFICANDUM ON MS. CARISSA THOMAS WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. THE DEFENDANTS MAY DEPOSE MS. CARISSA THOMAS WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. WITHIN FIVE (5) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER THE PLAINTIFF SHALL PROVIDE THE DEFENDANTS WITH ANY CONTACT INFORMATION FOR MS. CARISSA THOMAS THE PLAINTIFF MAY HAVE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 10/6/2014. 10/7/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ems) |
Filing 76 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO.65) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 8/21/2014. 8/22/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (kk, ) |
Filing 36 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 8) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT I OF THE COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT II OF THE COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS III AND IV OF THE COMPLAINT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 12/20/2012. 12/20/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.