Cases 1 - 10 of 100
ADAMS v. ST. LUKES UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK et al
as 5:2026cv03600
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN ANTHONY ADAMS
Defendant:
ST. LUKES UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK and THE CITY OF ALLENTOWN, PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 139
City of Allentown v. REV Group Inc et al
as 2:2026cv00811
Plaintiff:
City of Allentown
Defendant:
REV Group Inc, E-ONE Inc, Kovatch Mobile Equipment Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
CITY OF ALLENTOWN v. REV GROUP, INC. et al
as 5:2026cv02649
Plaintiff:
CITY OF ALLENTOWN
Defendant:
REV GROUP, INC., E-ONE, INC., KOVATCH MOBILE EQUIPMENT CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
IN RE: Fire Apparatus Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2026md03179
Unknown:
Fire Apparatus Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
City of La Crosse, City of Augusta, The Newstead Fire Co Inc and others
Defendant:
Oshkosh Corporation, Pierce Manufacturing Inc, REV Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv07038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-3420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv06112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
RISHEL v. CITY OF ALLENTOWN et al
as 5:2025cv03779
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP RISHEL
Defendant:
CITY OF ALLENTOWN, DEAN FLYTE and CHRISTOPHER STEPHENSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv02808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv01673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
