Brown v. Edinger et al
| Joseph A. Brown |
| Matt Edinger, United States Of America and USP Lewisburg |
| 1:2014cv01133 |
| June 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Union |
| CP |
| Sylvia H. Rambo |
| Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
150
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBYORDERED as follows: 1) The FR&R of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED; 2) Judgment as a matter of law is GRANTED in favor of Deft Matt Edinger for Pltfs failure to exhaust all available administrative remedies; 3) The Clerk of Court is directed to close this file. 142 Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 12/27/17. (sc)
|
|
Filing
103
MEMORANDUM re Mtn to add supplemental brief 89 , Mtn to file objs 91 , Mtn for Sanctions 92 and mtn for Reconsideration 102 (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 6/15/16. (ma)
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM re REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 56 of MJ Saporito and mtn to apppoint cnsl 64 (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 2/24/16. (ma)
|
|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)re: Doc. 29 Motion to Amend and Docs. 39, 40, 41 and 44 Motions to Clarify, Correct, Add and Supplement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 6/4/15. (ms)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
