Crawford v. While et al
Antonio R. Crawford |
While, Shermon, Debra Mink, J. T. Thomas, Stage and P. Fredrick |
1:2014cv01682 |
August 28, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Harrisburg Office |
Union |
William W. Caldwell |
Martin C. Carlson |
Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 ORDER: In accord with the Memorandum 54 filed this date; 1. The magistrate judges report 48 is ADOPTED.2. Dfts mtn to dismiss and/or for summary judgment 30 is GRANTED.3. Pltfs mtn to be released from the SMU 44 is DENIED.4. The Clerk of Court shall close this file.Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 06/16/15. (ma) |
Filing 47 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 46 MOTION to Compel filed by Antonio R. Crawford. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on April 10, 2015. (kjn) |
Filing 45 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 41 MOTION for Protective Order . Discovery is stayed pending resolution of the pending motion todismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on April 2, 2015. (kjn) |
Filing 11 ORDER: 1. The R and R of MJ Carlson 9 is adopted.2. Pltfs mtn for preliminary injunctive relief 2 is DENIED.3. This case is remanded to MJ Carlson for further proceedings, including an R&R on any dispositive motions that may be filed. Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 09/16/14. (ma) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.