Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Demarest v. Town of Underhill
as 24-147
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID P. DEMAREST
Defendant / Appellee: TOWN OF UNDERHILL, a municipality and charter town, DANIEL STEINABAUER, as an individual and in official capacity as Selectboard Chair, BOB STONE, as an individual and in official capacity and others
Moshir v. As (AND) while are: Find (AND) to be (AND AS) to have been found We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv10594
Plaintiff: Al Moshir
Defendant: As (AND) while are: Find (AND) to be (AND AS) to have been found
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PC) Brown v. Flores et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02487
Plaintiff: Hameed J. Brown
Defendant: Flores, Colledge and While
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moshir v. While our personal belongins of the OPDC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv08787
Plaintiff: Al Moshir
Defendant: While our personal belongings of the OPDC and The Correspond[ences]/EDS/INGS]
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moshir v. NYPD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv07414
Plaintiff: Al Moshir
Defendant: NYPD, NYS, U.S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. The Personal Diary of General Nikolai Nikolaevich Iudenitch Hensingfors, 1919 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02636
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: The Personal Diary of General Nikolai Nikolaevich Iudenitch Hensingfors, 1919, Order Of The Supreme Ruler On The Appointment Of Lieutenant General Anton Ivanovich Denikin As Deputy Of The Supreme Commander-In-Chief, While Retaining Command Over The Armed Forces In The South Of R, Photograph Of Admiral Kolchak, General Zhanen, Bogan Pavli In Front Of General Headquarters In The City Of Omsk and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
Daniel Willis v. Jones County Public Schools
as 22-1923
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS
Defendant / Appellee: JONES COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, THE TOWN OF TRENTON, DARLENE SPIVEY, Mayor and others
Demarest v. Underhill
as 22-956
Plaintiff / Appellant: David P. Demarest and David Parsons Demarest
Defendant / Appellee: Town of Underhill, a municipality and charter town, Daniel Steinabauer, as an individual and in official capacity as Selectboard Chair, Bob Stone, as an individual and in official capacity and others
Defendant: Front Porch Forum, as a Public Benefit 15 Corporation fairly treated as acting under color of law due to past and present 16 factual considerations while serving the traditional governmental role of providing 17 "Essential Civic Infrastructure" rangi and Jericho Underhill Land Trust, as NonProfit 21 Corporation fairly treated as acting under color of law due to past and present 22 factual considerations and a special relationship willfully participating in and 23 actively directing acquisition of mun
Gary Dubin v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel, et al
as 21-16839
Plaintiff / Appellant: GARY VICTOR DUBIN
Defendant / Appellee: OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF THE HAWAII SUPREME COURT, BRADLEY R TAMM, in his individual personal capacity while serving under color of law as both the Chief Disciplinary Counsel of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Hawaii Supreme Court and the Fund Administrator of the Lawyers' Fund for Client P and CLIFFORD L. NAKEA, in his individual personal capacity while serving under color of law as Chairperson of the Disciplinary Board of the Hawaii Supreme Court
v. Capstone Healthcare, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02480
Plaintiff: Plaintiff/RELATOR Bryce Lindgren
Defendant: Capstone Healthcare, LLC, CEO Capstone Jay Johnson, Chair BOD Capstone Drew Maloney and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?