King v. Mansfield University of Pennsylvania et al
| Patrick King |
| Mansfield University of Pennsylvania, The Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education, John Halsted and Christine Shegan |
| 1:2015cv00159 |
| January 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Tioga |
| Sylvia H. Rambo |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
MEMORANDUM and ORDER: 1. Dft is granted leave to re-depose Dr. Lieberman and may subpoena her to testify;a. Dft shall compensate Dr. Lieberman for her entire time, including any reasonable time spent preparing for the deposition, at her usual hourly rate;b. Dft shall use reasonable efforts to assist Mr. King, Mr. Pinskey, and Dr. Lieberman with any technology necessary for them to participate in the deposition;2. Mr. Pinskey shall produce to Dft copies of all records and information that Dr. Lie berman relied upon in rendering her opinion and report;3. Mr. Pinskey shall produce his communications with Dr. Lieberman to the extent the communication (1) contains facts or data that Mr. Pinskey provided and that Ms. Lieberman relied on in renderi ng her opinion and report, or (2) identifies assumptions that Mr. Pinskey provided and that Ms. Lieberman relied on in rendering her opinion and report. See R.D., 2018 WL 2364749, at *3; Pritchard, 263 F.R.D. at 292;4. Mr. Pinskey may redact or withh old any responsive document that reflects legal theories or other attorney work product. See Pritchard, 263 F.R.D. at 291-292 (outlining scope of work product doctrine in context of expert witnesses). Any such documents shall be listed in a detailed privilege log that for each document contains: (1) an express claim of work product or other privilege that also specifies, where appropriate, whether the protected information constitutes factual or opinion work product; and (2) a description of the information withheld sufficient to allow Defendant to assess the claim of privilege without viewing the protected information;5. Unless the parties agree otherwise, Mr. Pinskey shall produce to Dft the aforementioned documents by 11/1/20 and the privilege log by 11/15/20;6. Any documents produced shall not be disclosed to non-parties;7. No other discovery is permitted unless ordered by the court.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 10/6/20. (ma)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER - In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 60 : Pltf's mtn for reconsideration 56 is Denied.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 6/21/19. (ma)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER - In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 54 : Dfts' mtn for summary jgmnt 38 is Granted with respect to Cnts I-VI against Dft Halstead. Dfts' mtn is Denied with respect to Cnts V and VI against dft Shegan.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 2/28/19. (ma)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 35 ; Pltf's mtn for partial summary jgmnt 24 is Denied as Moot.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 3/8/18. (ma)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM re dfts' MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings 17 (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 11/3/16. (ma)
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM re pltf's MOTION to Remand 6 filed by Patrick King (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 08/05/15. (ma)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
