Banks v. Manpowergroup, Inc.
Plaintiff: Thomas Banks
Defendant: Manpowergroup, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2014cv02483
Filed: December 30, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Williamsport Office
County: Potter
Presiding Judge: Matthew W. Brann
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 7/10/15. Defendant ManpowerGroup, Inc. d/b/a Experis US, Inc.'s motion to dismiss Count III of the amended complaint (doc 14) is denied. (lg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Banks v. Manpowergroup, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Banks
Represented By: Samuel J. Cordes
Represented By: Jessica B. Michael
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Manpowergroup, Inc.
Represented By: Alexander Nemiroff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?