Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Bayne et al v. Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd. et al
as 8:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
RANDY BAYNE, John Anderson, Anne Banks and others
Defendant:
Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd., TAI'AN TAISHAN PLASTERBOARD CO., LTD., Tai'an Taishan Plasterboard Co., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Banks v. Wendy et al
as 2:2021cv00189
Plaintiff:
Thomas Banks
Defendant:
Nurse Wendy and Forsyth County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv06561
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURDEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv56340
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BANKS BURDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant v. Adex Corporation
as 1:2018cv01282
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bryant , Thomas Banks , Michael Heller and others
Defendant:
Adex Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 207
Banks et al v. Nationstar Mortgage et al
as 5:2017cv00036
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Banks and Shakima Thomas Banks
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage and Sentry Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Banks et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07158
Plaintiff:
Gloria Banks and Thomas Banks
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv12455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Banks v. Manpowergroup, Inc.
as 4:2014cv02483
Plaintiff:
Thomas Banks
Defendant:
Manpowergroup, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Banks et al v. Allstate Indemnity Company
as 5:2012cv00673
Plaintiff:
Thomas Banks and Becky Banks
Defendant:
Allstate Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
