BRACEY v. PRICE et al
| COREY BRACEY |
| PRICE, DAN DAVIS, DIANE THOMAS, EAGLE, WORKMAN, LEGGET, BITNER and LESURE |
| 2:2009cv01662 |
| December 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Fayette |
| Amy Reynolds Hay |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
Opinion and ORDER granting 82 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 12/3/2012. (ndf )A copy of the Opinion and Order has been forwarded to Plaintiff at his address of record via first class mail.
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 68 Motion to Compel Discovery; denying 70 Motion to Compel Discovery; denying 70 Motion Toll Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 03/13/2012. (ndf ) A copy of the Opinion and Order is being forwarded this day to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail to his address of record.
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 39 Partial Motion to Dismiss. It is granted as to the claims against Defendant Anderson for allegedly sexually harassing Plaintiff when he conducted a strip search of Plaintiff on D ecember 13, 2007 and that claim is dismissed with prejudice. It is granted as to any Section 1983 claims against DOC and Defendant Beard, in his official capacity and those claims are dismissed with prejudice. It is granted with prejudice as to any Sixth Amendment claims, which are dismissed with prejudice. It is granted with prejudice as to any procedural due process claim against Defendant Cross but is denied as to Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendant Cross. It is granted with prejudice as to any federal law claims against Defendants Varner, Coleman, and MaciIntyre because Plaintiff cannot allege their personal involvement. The Court sua sponte dismisses, with prejudice, 1) all federal law claims again st Defendant Gates for any potential procedural due process claim and any potential retaliation claim; 2) all federal law claims against Defendant Beard, in his personal capacity, for allegedly promulgating a policy, barring prisoners from having dec larations of other inmates; and 3) all federal law claims against Defendant Braunlich. The partial Motion to Dismiss is denied as to any Fourth Amendment invasion of privacy claims in connection with viewing Plaintiff nude in his cell and as to Plaintiff's state law claim of conversion.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 7/1/2011. (dgg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
