Smyth v. Urch et al
Plaintiff: Keith A Smyth
Defendant: Neal Urch, Amandy Blanton, William J. Church, J. Brock and K. Ashley
Case Number: 0:2014cv03476
Filed: August 28, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Rock Hill Office
County: Spartanburg
Presiding Judge: Paige J Gossett
Presiding Judge: R Bryan Harwell
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 174 ORDER adopting 170 Report and Recommendation, dismissing the case with prejudice for failure to prosecute as to defendants Neal Urch, Deputy J. Brock, and Deputy K. Ashley, and denying the Defendants' 158 Motion for Summary Judgment as moot. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 3/22/2016. (bgoo)
December 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 161 ORDER the plaintiff shall advise the court as to whether he wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to the defendants' motion for summary judgment 135 within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. Plaintiff is further advised that if he fails to respond, this action will be recommended for dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 12/16/2015. (gmil)
October 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 156 ORDER ADOPTING 152 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION denying 135 Defendants' motion for summary judgment without prejudice and with leave to refile. The Court grants Defendants leave to refile a renewed motion for summary judgment within thirty (30) days of the date of the entry of this order. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 10/7/2015. (gmil)
May 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 143 ORDER RULING ON 31 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION dismissing Defendants Amandy Blanton and William J. Church without prejudice and without service of process. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following claims are dismissed without prejudice: (1) equal protection; (2) prison grievance system; (3) deprivation of person property (4) violation of the PREA; (5) claims against Defendant Urch for allegedly refusing to allow delivery of all mail, provide adequate food portions, provid e hygiene items, and provide over the counter pain medications; and (6) claims for violations of Plaintiffs right to vote, right to bond, and right to fair, public, and speedy trial. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 5/14/2015. (gmil) Modified to edit docket text on 5/14/2015 (gmil).
March 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 130 ORDER - Plaintiff's objections 123 to the Magistrate Judge's order are without merit. Accordingly, the Order 118 is AFFIRMED. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 3/3/2015. (gmil) Modified to edit docket text on 3/3/2015 (gmil).
January 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 118 ORDER denying 26 Motion Full Disclosure, 27 Motion Retain All Legal Documents filed by Keith A Smyth, 28 Motion Right to Purchase Supplies filed by Keith A Smyth, 29 Motion To Be Treated Equally and Rehoused in Another Pod, 37 Motion To Rec eive All Plaintiff's Unopened Mail, 43 Motion for issuance of Subpoena, 47 Motion to receive unopened mail, 49 Motion for Discovery, 60 Motion for issuance of Subpoena, 61 Motion for issuance of Subpoena, 62 Motion for issuance of Su bpoena, 65 Motion for Discovery, 66 Motion for Discovery, 68 Motion to Amend/Correct, 72 Motion for US Marshals to be guards, 74 Motion for Default Judgment as to Neal Urch, J. Brock, K. Ashley, 76 Motion for issuance of Subpoena, 78 Mo tion to Amend/Correct, 82 Motion for Discovery, 90 Motion for DHEC investigation of Spartanburg County Detention Facility, 91 Motion to Amend/Correct, 96 Motion to keep more than 3 inches of legal mail, 99 Motion for inspection of jail, [10 0] Motion to keep more than 3 inches of legal mail in cell, 101 Motion for US Marshals to be guards and for technology and Motion for Default Judgment as to Neal Urch, J. Brock, K. Ashley and Motion for issuance of Subpoena, 106 Motion to get req uested copies of documents, 109 Motion to Stay, 111 Motion to Appoint Counsel, 112 Motion for relief from discipline and Motion for Mental Examination, 113 Motion for DHEC Inspection; denying as futile 41 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying wi thout prejudice 77 Motion to Request technology, 93 Motion for issuance of Subpoena, 96 Motion for Hearing, and 117 Motion for Hearing; terminating as moot 36 Motion to Serve Defendants and 48 Motion to Serve Defendants; granting in part 98 Motion for Extension of Time, 103 Motion for Extension of Time, and 106 Motion for Extension of Time. Motions Deadline reset for March 20, 2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 1/28/2015. (gmil)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smyth v. Urch et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith A Smyth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Neal Urch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amandy Blanton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William J. Church
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Brock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K. Ashley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?