Brown v. South Carolina, State of et al
| Orlando Ira Brown |
| Richland County Sheriffs, FBI, South Carolina, State of, Columbia SC, City of and Richland County |
| 3:2012cv00221 |
| January 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Richland |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Margaret B Seymour |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
ORDER AND OPINION RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 37 Report and Recommendation and dismissing the complaint without prejudice and without issuance and service of process, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction denying as moot 18 Motion for Injunction; denying as moot 13 Motion to Amend/Correct 5 Amended Complaint; denying as moot 20 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying as moot 7 Motion for Relief Sought; denying as moot [9 2] Motion for a reasonable accommodation to bypass any statutes of limitations on time that would otherwise bar this action from proceeding to judgment; denying as moot 22 Motion for Injunction; denying as moot 77 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying as moot 11 Motion to File Bank Account Number; denying as moot 34 Motion for Recognition of Marital Rights Signed by Chief Judge Margaret B Seymour on 9/27/2012. (asni, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
