Cruise v. Lumpkin
Petitioner: Robbie Duane Cruise
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Case Number: 4:2021cv00705
Filed: March 4, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Peter Bray
Referring Judge: Lynn N Hughes
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Motion for Katherine Abell to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter Bray) Parties notified.(jmarchand, 4)
April 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MOTION for Katherine Abell to Appear Pro Hac ViceMotions referred to Peter Bray. by Bobby Lumpkin, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/10/2021. (mmapps, 4)
April 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER denying as moot #10 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter Bray) Parties notified.(jmarchand, 4)
April 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number GAL004375, filed. (agould, 3)
April 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Robbie Duane Cruise, filed.(agould, 3)
April 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Robbie Duane Cruise, filed. (agould, 3)
April 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma PauperisMotions referred to Peter Bray. by Robbie Duane Cruise, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/28/2021. (agould, 3)
March 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Certified Mail Receipt Returned as to Attorney General of Texas, Habeas Corpus Division, executed on 3/11/2021 re: 7 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (olindor, 4)
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Letter from Robbie Duane Cruise re: Documents sent to Galveston Division, filed. (JosephWells, 4)
March 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO ANSWER, ORDER FOR SERVICE ON TX ATTORNEY GENERAL. Filing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis due within 30 days. Answer due within 60 days. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter Bray) (Attachments: #1 Petition) Parties notified.(jmarchand, 4)
March 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Specific Referral to Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4)
March 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to SDTX Houston Division (Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(ltrevino, 3)
February 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed.
February 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Robbie Duane Cruise.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cruise v. Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Represented By: Katherine Abell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robbie Duane Cruise
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?