Cases 1 - 10 of 2,656
Wynn v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02094
Petitioner:
Xavier Wynn
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aluiso v. Lumpkin
as 23-40329
Petitioner / Appellant:
Guadalupe Aluiso, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Dobson v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00714
Petitioner:
Raymond Eugene Dobson
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Escobedo v. Lumpkin
as 23-10573
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jereme Lee Escobedo
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 23-70002
Petitioner:
Dexter Johnson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Bales v. Lumpkin
as 23-40318
Petitioner / Appellant:
James Preston Bales
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Evans v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv01997
Plaintiff:
Ishmael A. Evans
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Capt. Christopher Norsworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Lumpkin
as 23-40313
Petitioner / Appellant:
John F. Hawkins
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Medina v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02041
Petitioner:
Ernesto Medina
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Littles v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00027
Petitioner:
Justin A. Littles
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
