Sanchez v. Lumpkin
| Enriquez Ricardo Sanchez |
| Bobby Lumpkin |
| 4:2021cv03449 |
| October 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| George C Hanks |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #8 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; granting #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File More Definite Statement. (More Definite Statement due by 1/7/2022) (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4)
|
|
Filing 10
MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT by Enriquez Ricardo Sanchez, filed. (Attachments: #1 Continuation, #2 Continuation, #3 Continuation, #4 Continuation, #5 Continuation, #6 Continuation, #7 Continuation, #8 Continuation, #9 Continuation, #10 Continuation, #11 Continuation, #12 Continuation, #13 Continuation, #14 Continuation, #15 Continuation, #16 Continuation, #17 Continuation, #18 Continuation, #19 Continuation, #20 Continuation, #21 Continuation, #22 Continuation, #23 Continuation, #24 Continuation, #25 Continuation, #26 Continuation, #27 Continuation, #28 Continuation, #29 Envelope)(jdav, 4)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for Extension of Time to File More Definite Statement by Enriquez Ricardo Sanchez, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/15/2021. (BrandisIsom, 4)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Enriquez Ricardo Sanchez, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/15/2021. (BrandisIsom, 4)
|
|
Filing 7
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Enriquez Ricardo Sanchez, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4)
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Enriquez Ricardo Sanchez, filed.(jtabares, 1)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT as to Enriquez Ricardo Sanchez denying 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.( More Definite Statement due within 30 days). (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(gclair, 4)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4)
|
|
Filing 3
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Enriquez Ricardo Sanchez, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Enriquez Ricardo Sanchez, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/8/2021. (BrandisIsom, 4)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Enriquez Ricardo Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Memo, #2 Envelope)(BrandisIsom, 4) (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/20/2021) (BrandisIsom, 4).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sanchez v. Lumpkin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Enriquez Ricardo Sanchez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin | |
| Represented By: | Edward Larry Marshall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
