Rodriguez v. Lumpkin
Petitioner: Ruben Rodriguez
Respondent: Lorie Davis and Bobby Lumpkin
Case Number: 5:2020cv01107
Filed: September 14, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Orlando L Garcia
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Ruben Rodriguez. (wg)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Bobby Lumpkin. (Harp, Sarah)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Sarah Miranda Harp on behalf of Bobby Lumpkin. Attorney Sarah Miranda Harp added to party Bobby Lumpkin(pty:res) (Harp, Sarah)
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Remark: Copy of Service Order & Habeas Corpus Petition was e-mailed to Edward L. Marshall, and Laura Haney. (wg)
October 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO ANSWER PETITION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Ruben Rodriguez. The Clerk is Ordered to send a Copy of this Order & Petition to the Respondents via e-mail to Edward L. Marshall, Asst A.G., and Laura Haney. Respondent must answer the petition within thirty (30) days after receiving this order. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg)
October 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Filing fee received in the amount of $5.00, receipt number 500055736 (mgr)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DEFICIENCY ORDER, ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of the filing of this Order, Petitioner must submit to the Court either the required filing fee of $5.00 or a completed application to proceed IFP. If the petitioner submits an IFP application. The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward Petitioner this Courts standard IFP application. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg)
September 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Case Opening Letter to Ruben Rodriguez. (nm)
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Ruben Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Copy of Envelope)(nm)
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney. (nm)
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO CHIEF JUDGE ORLANDO GARCIA. (nm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lorie Davis
Represented By: Edward L. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Represented By: Edward L. Marshall
Represented By: Sarah Miranda Harp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ruben Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?