Stroud v. Lumpkin
Petitioner: Carlton Stroud
Respondent: Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Case Number: 5:2021cv00120
Filed: February 5, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Fred Biery
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Reset Deadlines: Bobby Lumpkin answer due 4/12/2021. (bc)
March 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Judge Fred Biery. Respondent's deadline for filing an answer or other responsive pleading is extended to Monday, April 12, 2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jg5)
March 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with Brief in Support by Bobby Lumpkin. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sharon, Eran)
February 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Eran Shemuel Sharon on behalf of Bobby Lumpkin. Attorney Eran Shemuel Sharon added to party Bobby Lumpkin(pty:res) (Sharon, Eran)
February 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO ANSWER PETITION- Marshall and Haney received notification electronically. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (bc)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis entered by Judge Fred Biery. The U.S. Clerk is directed to accept Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2254 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (ECF No. 1) without prepayment of the required $5.00 filing fee. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jg5)
February 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Case Opening Letter to Carlton Stroud. (fs)
February 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Carlton Stroud. (fs)
February 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Carlton Stroud. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Copy of Envelope)(fs)
February 5, 2021 Opinion or Order If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer. (fs)
February 5, 2021 Opinion or Order THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE FRED BIERY. (fs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stroud v. Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bryan Collier
Represented By: Edward L. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Represented By: Edward L. Marshall
Represented By: Eran Shemuel Sharon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Carlton Stroud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?