Barnard v. Piedmont Regional Jail Authority et al
Timothy Barnard |
Piedmont Regional Jail Authority, Andrew Johnson, James Davis, Michael Jackson, Christopher Williams, Duane Merritt and Clarence Whitehead |
3:2007cv00566 |
September 13, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Richmond Office |
Wise |
Richard L. Williams |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 105 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by District Judge Richard L. Williams on 10/21/09. (kyou, ) |
Filing 102 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge; plaintiff AWARDED compensatory damages in the amount of $250.00 from defendants Jackson, Johnson, Whitehead, and Davis; plaintiff AWARDED punitive damages of $3,000.00 against d efendant Johnson; $1,500.00 against defendant Jackson; $1,000.00 each against defendants Davis and Whitehead; plaintiff's counsel DIRECTED to submit w/in 11 days of date of entry hereof a fee petition for an award of costs and attorney 's fees; a final order specifying total amount of damages award, including costs and fees will issue thereafter; Clerk DIRECTED to send copy of the Memorandum Opinion and Order to defendants and counsel of record; Signed by District Judge Richard L. Williams on 9/3/09. (lsal) (Copies mailed: yes, as directed) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.