Kilmer v. McCulley et al
||Christopher Wilkes, Gregory Jones, Chris McCulley, Perry S. Layne and Gregory Jenkins
||Marc Allen Kilmer
||June 11, 2012
||West Virginia Northern District Court
||Gina M. Groh
||John S. Kaull
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 27, 2012
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFF'S 1983 COMPLAINT adopting 18 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, the Court hereby DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this case as it relates to Defendants Christopher Wilkes, Judge; Gregory Jones, Prosecutor; Gregory Jenkins; and Chris McCulley, Deputy. Defendant Perry Layne is hereby ORDERED to be served with a twenty-one (21) day summons. Defendants Wilkes, Jones, Jenkins and McCulley terminated. Signed by District Judge Gina M. Groh on 9/27/2012. Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff by CMRR. (cwm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/27/2012: # 1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (cwm).
|April 24, 2013
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 36 Report and Recommendation; dismissing as moot 32 Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment; and granting 29 Motion for Summary Judgment. This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and ORDER ED STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment for the Defendant. Signed by District Judge Gina M. Groh on 4/24/2013. Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff by CMRR.(cwm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/24/2013: # 1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (cwm).
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.