Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States v. Christopher Wilks
as 21-2155
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Wilks
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Cardinal Health, Inc. v. National Board of Medical Examiners
as 3:2020cv00453
Respondent:
National Board of Medical Examiners
Petitioner:
Cardinal Health, Inc.
Special Master:
Christopher Wilkes
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Wilks v. Little Rock, City of et al
as 4:2019cv00719
Defendant:
Travis Cummings, Eric Hedgecock, Bruce Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wilks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Thompson et al
as 5:2019ct03036
Plaintiff:
Angelo Smith, Jr., Joey L. Raborn, Jr. and Christopher Wilkes
Defendant:
Macre R. Crider, Michelle Reynolds, Richard Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kilmer v. McCulley et al
as 3:2012cv00055
Plaintiff:
Marc Allen Kilmer
Defendant:
Chris McCulley, Perry S. Layne, Gregory Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trinidade v. Genworth et al
as 3:2012cv00011
Plaintiff:
Dinesh B. Trinidade
Defendant:
Christopher Wilkes, Genworth Mortgage Insurance Corporation , HSBC Mortgage Corporation (USA) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens et al v. Bayer Schering Pharma AG et al
as 3:2010cv12881
Plaintiff:
Andrea Stevens and Christopher Wilks
Defendant:
Bayer Schering Pharma AG and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DATATRAK International, Inc. v. Ward et al
as 1:2008cv02182
Plaintiff:
DATATRAK International, Inc., DATATRAK International, Inc. and DATATRAK International, Inc.
Defendant:
Jim Bob Ward, William Coates, Jennifer Fox and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Wilks et al v. Cook County et al
as 1:2007cv06777
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wilks, Christopher Wilks and Christopher Wilks
Defendant:
Cook County, W. Woods and J Dugger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
