Tooley v. Ballard

Tooley v. Ballard

Petitioner:	James Lee Tooley
Respondent:	David Ballard
Case Number:	1:2009cv00183
Filed:	February 27, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Bluefield Office
County:	Fayette
Presiding Judge:	David A. Faber
Presiding Judge:	R. Clarke VanDervort
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 27, 2012	Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court OVERRULES plaintiff's 6 objections; ADOPTS the 5 Proposed Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge VanDervort; DISMISSES plaintiff's 1 Section 2254 petition; DENIES plaintiff's 1 motion for stay/abeyance and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove the matter from the court's docket. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 3/27/2012. (cc: Plaintiff, Pro Se and counsel of record) (arb)
March 17, 2009	Filing 4 ORDER Directing that this case be transferred from the Charleston Division to the Bluefield Division to be henceforth known as Civil Action 1:09-0183 and reassigned to the Honorable David A. Faber, United States District Judge, for all further procee dings; it is also directed that the reference of this civil action to Magistrate Judge Stanley be withdrawn and that the case instead be referred to Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort for total pretrial management and submission of proposed findings of fact and recommendations of disposition. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 3/16/2009. (cc: Judge Faber; Magistrate Judge Stanley; Magistrate Judge VanDervort; attys; any unrepresented party) (ras)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 27, 2012

Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court OVERRULES plaintiff's 6 objections; ADOPTS the 5 Proposed Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge VanDervort; DISMISSES plaintiff's 1 Section 2254 petition; DENIES plaintiff's 1 motion for stay/abeyance and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove the matter from the court's docket. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 3/27/2012. (cc: Plaintiff, Pro Se and counsel of record) (arb)

March 17, 2009

Filing 4 ORDER Directing that this case be transferred from the Charleston Division to the Bluefield Division to be henceforth known as Civil Action 1:09-0183 and reassigned to the Honorable David A. Faber, United States District Judge, for all further procee dings; it is also directed that the reference of this civil action to Magistrate Judge Stanley be withdrawn and that the case instead be referred to Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort for total pretrial management and submission of proposed findings of fact and recommendations of disposition. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 3/16/2009. (cc: Judge Faber; Magistrate Judge Stanley; Magistrate Judge VanDervort; attys; any unrepresented party) (ras)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tooley v. Ballard
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: James Lee Tooley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: David Ballard
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?