Underwood v. Cauley
Dwayne Underwood |
E. K. Cauley |
1:2011cv00217 |
April 4, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Bluefield Office |
McDowell |
David A. Faber |
R. Clarke VanDervort |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court OVERRULES Petitioner's Objection to Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort's Proposed Findings and Recommendation; ADOPTS the 21 Proposed Findings and Recommendation; DISMISSES Petitioner's 1 Section 2241 Petition and DISMISSES this matter from the Court's active docket. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 8/22/2014. (cc: Petitioner, Pro Se) (arb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Underwood v. Cauley | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: E. K. Cauley | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Dwayne Underwood | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.