Kaufman v. United States of America
| Jean Elizabeth Kaufman |
| United States of America |
| 1:2012cv00237 |
| March 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Bluefield Office |
| Greenbrier |
| David A. Faber |
| R. Clarke VanDervort |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
154
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's 4 Complaint and DENIES AS MOOT the following motions related to trial: USA's 88 MOTION in Limine; USA's 89 SECOND MOTION in Limine; Plaintiff's 94 (Faxed Versio n) MOTION in Limine; Plaintiff's 95 (Faxed Version) MOTION in Limine; Plaintiff's 97 (Original) MOTION in Limine; Plaintiff's 98 (Original) MOTION in Limine; Plaintiff's 99 MOTION in Limine; Plaintiff's 101 MOTION i n Limine; USA's 109 THIRD MOTION in Limine; Plaintiff's 115 MOTION in Limine; Plaintiff's 124 LETTER-FORM MOTION for Permission to File Electronically via CM/ECF; Plaintiff's 136 EMERGENCY MOTION for Remote Testimony, Unav ailable Witness Testimony and Other Witness Testimony and Plaintiff's 136 EMERGENCY MOTION to Expedite. The Clerk is DIRECTED to remove this matter from the Court's active docket. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 1/7/2015. (cc: Plaintiff, Pro Se and all counsel of record) (arb)
|
|
Filing
137
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying plaintiff's 74 REQUEST/MOTION for remote testimony and denying plaintiff's 132 MOTION for deposition testimony. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 6/17/2014. (cc: plaintiff, pro se and counsel of record) (arb)
|
|
Filing
129
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: the court ADOPTS the 112 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge VanDervort; DENIES 93 and 96 Motions for Leave to Amend filed by Jean Elizabeth Kaufman, and DENIES 67 Motion to Dismiss filed by United States of America. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 6/6/2014. (cc: plaintiff, pro se and counsel of record) (mjp)
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court ADOPTS the 49 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge VanDervort; DENIES the United States' 37 Motion for Summary Judgment and refers this matter back to Magistrate Judge VanDervort for further proceedings. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 1/8/2014. (cc: Plaintiff, Pro Se and counsel of record) (arb)
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's 27 MOTION to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 6/25/2013. (cc: Plaintiff, pro se and counsel of record) (mjp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kaufman v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Stephen M. Horn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jean Elizabeth Kaufman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
