Price v. Hogsten
James Dennis Price |
Karen Hogsten |
1:2012cv00646 |
March 5, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Bluefield Office |
McDowell |
David A. Faber |
R. Clarke VanDervort |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: the court ADOPTS the 22 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge VanDervort and DISMISSES plaintiff's 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this matter from the court's docket. The court DENIES a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 10/27/2014. (cc: counsel of record and plaintiff pro se) (mjp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Price v. Hogsten | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Karen Hogsten | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: James Dennis Price | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.