Johnson v. Butler
La'Shan Deneice Johnson |
Sandra Butler |
1:2013cv04401 |
March 6, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Bluefield Office |
XX US, Outside State |
David A. Faber |
R. Clarke VanDervort |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the 43 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort; GRANTS Respondent's 40 MOTION to Dismiss and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this case from the Court's docket. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 9/29/2014. (cc: Petitioner, Pro Se and counsel of record) (arb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Johnson v. Butler | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Sandra Butler | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: La'Shan Deneice Johnson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.