Smith v. Hsbc Yahama Music, et al.
| Tavius L. Smith |
| The Progressive Corporation, Cach, LLC and Hsbc Yamaha Music |
| 1:2014cv00525 |
| January 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Bluefield Office |
| McDowell |
| David A. Faber |
| R. Clarke VanDervort |
| Other Contract |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the 26 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort; DENIES Plaintiff's 6 Motion for Entry of Default Judgment Against Defendants HSBC Yamaha Music and Cach, LLC ; DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint as to Defendant Cach, LLC and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this matter from the Court's docket. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 7/2/2014. (cc: Plaintiff, Pro Se; all counsel of record and any unrepresented party) (arb)
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 15 Joint Stipulation for Partial Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice: The court ORDERS this action dismissed with prejudice as to defendant NCO Financial System, Inc. with each party bearing its own costs and attorne y's fees. Plaintiff will continue to maintain this action against the remaining defendants. Terminated defendant NCO Financial System, Inc. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 2/6/2014. (certified cc: Plaintiff, Pro Se; counsel of record and any unrepresented party) (arb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
