Chafin v. Hunter et al
| April Tomblin Chafin |
| John Does I - V, Logan County Commission, Eddie Hunter, Logan County Sheriff's Department, Logan County Home Confinement Department, John Reed and Lois Nelson |
| 2:2011cv00034 |
| January 12, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| Logan |
| John T. Copenhaver |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot defendant John Reed's 67 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages; denying defendant John Reed's 54 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying defendant John Reed's 54 MOTION f or New Trial; granting Logan County's 56 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law; directing that the liability and damage portions of the jury's verdict rendered in favor of Ms. Chafin and against Logan County are set aside. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 1/16/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (tmh)
|
|
Filing
64
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER pursuant to the jury trial held October 10-12, 2012, the court reporter is directed to accomplish the following redactions of the transcript as forth herein; directing that the unredacted version of the aforementioned pages herein be filed under seal. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 11/9/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (taq)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that civil action nos. 2:11-cv-0032, 2:11-cv-0033 and 2:11-cv-0034 are consolidated for purposes of pretrial development and conferencing; the court reserves the question of consolidation of the cases for trial pending a discussion of that matter at the pretrial conference following discovery; the Gilco case (2:11-cv-0032) is designated as the lead action; all further filings shall be captioned and docketed in that case; the court will issue a consolidated scheduling order this same day that will set a single trial date; if it is ultimately determined that the cases should not be consolidated for trial, this court, in consultation with counsel, will select the first action for trial, which will proceed according to the trial date set in the scheduling order; the remaining two actions will then be set for trial as expeditiously as possible thereafter. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 9/2/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
