McCoy v. Donahue et al
| Kevin B. McCoy |
| United States Postal Service and Patrick R. Donahue |
| 2:2011cv00308 |
| May 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| Kanawha |
| John T. Copenhaver |
| Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 791 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting defendants' 4 MOTION to Dismiss to the extent that it seeks dismissal with prejudice of McCoy's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; that in all other respects disposition of defendants' mot ion to dismiss is deferred pending the filing of an amended complaint within 30 days of this date; that with respect to his claims other than section 1983, McCoy is directed to file an amended complaint within 30 days of this date, in a pleadin g consistent with Twombly and its progeny, and as set forth more fully herein; defendants to have 14 days after the filing of the amended complaint to frame a response. The stay imposed by 10 order of the court on 8/12/2011 to remain in place pending the further order of the court. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 3/19/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (taq)
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting defendant's 7 MOTION for a stay pending resolution of the 4 MOTION to dismiss; further directing that this action is stayed pending the further order of the court, with the exception of the briefing on the motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 8/12/2011. (cc: attys) (mkw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
