Peterson v. Invent-Tech et al
||Invent Tech and Sam Artioli
||Brent Alan Peterson
||November 30, 2011
||West Virginia Southern District Court
||Mary E. Stanley
||John T. Copenhaver
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 12, 2012
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 24 Proposed Findings and Recommendation; and granting defendant Sam Artioli's 18 Motion for summary judgment. This case remains referred to the Honorable Mary E. Stanley, United States Magistrate Judge, for adjudication of the plaintiff's remaining claims. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 6/12/2012. (cc: pro se plaintiff; pro se defendant Sam Artioli; pro se defendant Invent Tech, 2655 Lejune Road, Suite 550, Coral Gables, FL 33134; Brett Pollack, Esq., 9350 South Dixie Highway, 10th Floor, Miami, FL 33156; United States Magistrate Judge) (taq)
|September 11, 2012
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 27 Proposed Findings and Recommendation; directing that this action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 9/11/2012. (cc: pro se plaintiff; Invent Tech at 2655 Lejune Road Suite 550, Coral Gables, Florida 33134; Brett Pollack, Esq., at 9350 South Dixie Highway, 10th Floor, Miami, Florida 33153; United States Magistrate Judge) (tmh)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.