McCoy v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
Plaintiff: Brenda McCoy
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Corporation and Jack Stepp
Case Number: 2:2011cv00927
Filed: November 18, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Charleston Office
County: Mingo
Presiding Judge: John T. Copenhaver
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 112 INCORRECT ENTRY - DOCUMENT FILED IN INCORRECT CASE - IMAGE DELETED. Modified on 1/4/2013 to delete image. (jkk)
June 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 57 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that defendant Norfolk Southern Corporation's 40 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction is held in abeyance for a 60-day period of jurisdictional discovery ending 8/15/2012; plaintiff, b earing the burden of proof, to file a supplemental response to defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction by 9/4/2012, and defendant to file a reply by 9/11/2012. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 6/14/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (taq)
March 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER; directing that the plaintiff's 9 MOTION to Remand is denied; plaintiff's 29 MOTION for leave to amend is denied; defendant Stepp's 6 MOTION to dismiss is granted; defendant Norfolk Southern Corporati on's 4 MOTION to dismiss, or alternatively, to quash service is granted to the extent that plaintiff's service of process upon Norfolk Southern Corporation is quashed; and that plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this order to properly serve Norfolk Southern Corporation. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 3/14/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (lca)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCoy v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brenda McCoy
Represented By: Jerry M. Lyall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Represented By: Alexis B. Mattingly
Represented By: J. David Bolen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Corporation
Represented By: J. David Bolen
Represented By: Alexis B. Mattingly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jack Stepp
Represented By: J. David Bolen
Represented By: Alexis B. Mattingly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?