Neuman v. West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals
Mark S. Neuman |
West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals |
2:2012cv00206 |
January 30, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
Kanawha |
John T. Copenhaver |
Mandamus and Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting and incorporating the 3 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, denying the 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus, and dismissing this action from the docket. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 4/18/2012. (cc: pro se petitioner; attys; United States Magistrate Judge) (tmh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Neuman v. West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Mark S. Neuman | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.