Brumfield v. McCann et al
||Jerry Bowman, Rocky Adkins, The County Commission of Lincoln County, West Virginia, West Virginia Counties Group Self Insurance Risk Pool, Charles McCann, Thomas Ramey, Jr., Judy Johnson and Donald Whitten
||May 10, 2012
||West Virginia Southern District Court
||Joseph R. Goodwin
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 4, 2012
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting defendants Charles McCann, Thomas Ramey Jr., Judy Johnson, and the County Commission of Lincoln County, West Virginia's 12 MOTION to Dismiss; directing that the claims against defendants McCann, Ramey, and Johnson in their official capacities and the claims against the County Commission of Lincoln County, West Virginia are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 9/4/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (taq)
|March 11, 2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting plaintiff's 36 MOTION for leave to file an amended complaint for damages and equitable relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; granting defendant Jerry Bowman's 24 MOTION to Dismiss; granting def endant Donald Whitten's 30 MOTION to Dismiss; granting defendants Judy Johnson, Charles McCann, and Thomas Ramey Jr.'s 47 MOTION to Dismiss; directing that the case, including all claims and counterclaims, be DISMISSED without prejudice and STRICKEN from the docket. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 3/11/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (taq)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.