Robinson v. Res-Care, Inc.

Robinson v. Res-Care, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Margaret I. Robinson
Defendant:	Res-Care, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2012cv05672
Filed:	September 20, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Charleston Office
County:	Kanawha
Presiding Judge:	Mary E. Stanley
Presiding Judge:	John T. Copenhaver
Nature of Suit:	Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 11, 2013	Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying plaintiff's 9 MOTION Not to Dismiss Complaint; granting defendant's 13 MOTION to Dismiss 10 Amended Complaint; plaintiff can amend complaint by 7/31/2013 to allege a state-law claim for wrongful termination; if the complaint is not amended by that date, this case will be terminated. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 7/11/2013. (cc: pro se plaintiff; attys; United States Magistrate Judge) (tmh)
April 10, 2013	Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff alleges that the Court did not mail her a copy of the Proposed Findings and Recommendation until January 14, 2013, preventing her from timely objecting. She further states that she would have responded to this had the court mailed it out on time, but appears to consider objections precluded by the passing of the January 14, 2013 deadline. Should the plaintiff not wish to object to the magistrate judges Proposed Findings and Recommendations, she may so advise the court in writing or do nothing Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 4/10/2013. (cc: attys; pro se plaintiff, Mag. Judge) (tmr)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 11, 2013

Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying plaintiff's 9 MOTION Not to Dismiss Complaint; granting defendant's 13 MOTION to Dismiss 10 Amended Complaint; plaintiff can amend complaint by 7/31/2013 to allege a state-law claim for wrongful termination; if the complaint is not amended by that date, this case will be terminated. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 7/11/2013. (cc: pro se plaintiff; attys; United States Magistrate Judge) (tmh)

April 10, 2013

Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff alleges that the Court did not mail her a copy of the Proposed Findings and Recommendation until January 14, 2013, preventing her from timely objecting. She further states that she would have responded to this had the court mailed it out on time, but appears to consider objections precluded by the passing of the January 14, 2013 deadline. Should the plaintiff not wish to object to the magistrate judges Proposed Findings and Recommendations, she may so advise the court in writing or do nothing Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 4/10/2013. (cc: attys; pro se plaintiff, Mag. Judge) (tmr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robinson v. Res-Care, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Margaret I. Robinson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Res-Care, Inc.
Represented By:	Ellen J. Vance
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?