Ward v. Seifert

Respondent: Evelyn Seifert
Petitioner: William R. Ward
Case Number: 2:2013cv05312
Filed: March 15, 2013
Court: West Virginia Southern District Court
Office: Charleston Office
County: Fayette
Referring Judge: Mary E. Stanley
Presiding Judge: John T. Copenhaver
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 30, 2014 35 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting and incorporating the 31 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge; further directing that this action is dismissed and stricken from the docket. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 9/30/2014. (cc: petitioner; counsel of record) (taq)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ward v. Seifert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Evelyn Seifert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William R. Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.